<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>epr marketing blog &#187; recycling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eprmarketing.com/marketingblog/tag/recycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eprmarketing.com/marketingblog</link>
	<description>ideas that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Green is nice benefit but cost savings get sales</title>
		<link>http://eprmarketing.com/marketingblog/2010/01/green-is-nice-benefit-but-cost-savings-get-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://eprmarketing.com/marketingblog/2010/01/green-is-nice-benefit-but-cost-savings-get-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Entin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eprmarketing.com/marketingblog/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green is a nice benefit but no competent manager is going to buy a product solely for its green benefit. They buy products, equipment and services either to increase sales or to cut costs, or both. A company I work with manufactures conveying equipment that enables converters to capture their waste paper, plastic and other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green is a nice benefit but no competent manager is going to buy a product solely for its green benefit. They buy products, equipment and services either to increase sales or to cut costs, or both. A company I work with manufactures conveying equipment that enables converters to capture their waste paper, plastic and other materials and send them right to a baler for recycling instead of paying to have a garbage company pick it up and dump it in a landfill. It also permits savings in labor costs by automating an otherwise manual process. That’s the primary benefit behind their success &#8211; the elimination and/or reduction of costs. Secondary benefits include a cleaner, healthier workplace with improved indoor air quality and a leaner, more efficient process. That these systems boost recycling and reduce landfilling makes them a green product. But it’s not why their customers bought them and were they to focus marketing efforts on their green credentials rather than on the cost-savings that sparked their growth it would likely be to their own peril. </p>
<p>Green is nice and highlighting it can help secure exposure in the media but it&#8217;s not the most important selling point. If it is, and if it&#8217;s not enjoying a government subsidy, then it&#8217;s likely not yet a viable product. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eprmarketing.com/marketingblog/2010/01/green-is-nice-benefit-but-cost-savings-get-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

