Posts Tagged ‘publicity’

Enter Awards And Boost Your PR Coverage

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

The editors who decide whether to publish your news are sometimes too busy wading through the badly written, irrelevant or otherwise uninteresting news to give your well-written, well-presented, timely news the attention it needs to get published – especially if your company doesn’t have a widely recognized name brand. And now this wave of sub-par news material is also flooding their Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn accounts. If you want to be sure your product or service gets the editorial attention you know it deserves, submit it for an award.

Best Recycling Container Meese Orbitron Dunne Co.

Winning awards such as this Best Recycling Container award yields a credible logo that may be used in your marketing materials forever.

While some busy editors may delete your press release even before reading it, they’re quite careful to review entries to their awards programs. In many cases, these editors have personally conceptualized and developed their awards programs, they have sold the idea to their publishers and have an interest in the program’s success. They’re actively seeking products worthy of an award and will devote time to reading about your product when presented in this format.

Some awards programs charge a fee to enter, others are free. If your product wins then you’ll enjoy a wave of publicity that generates qualified leads and boosts credibility while providing an award logo for use on your Web site, in your brochures, advertising and in other materials – forever. The nomination alone provides material for your social media program. And the photo of you taken with the award at the black tie gala will be the talk of Facebook. But settle down. It’s more than likely that your product won’t actually win the award, which is fine, because the goal is simply to capture the editor’s attention, which you will. And if the award entry is well written and well presented then your next press release will likely get the attention it rightfully deserves. Then you’ll not only get the publicity you need but you’ll enjoy having an editor actively seeking your material month after month.

Here are several awards that might be worth entering for your company:

Plastics News Process of the Year

Processing’s Breakthrough Products of the Year

R&D 100 Awards

Chemical Processing Vaaler Awards

Medical Design Excellence Awards

Bizbash Event Style Awards

ISRI Design for Recycling Awards

IADD Awards

Call epr for entry preparation guidance at 908-479-4231.

So Much Focus on the Medium, Don’t Forget the Message

Monday, June 27th, 2011

Many marketing professionals obsess about finding the ideal mix of advertising, direct mail, publicity, social media, email, TV and other media – the “media mix” per advertising textbooks. Certainly, it’s effective to use several different channels but many of these marketers seem so focused on the medium and the ratio that they forget about the message – they forget the reason for all of their pondering, theorizing and calculating is to deliver a sales message.

When faced with lackluster response they conclude, “advertising doesn’t work,” or “direct mail doesn’t work, we tried that.” “Next time, we’ll focus a higher percentage on publicity,” for example. It’s easier to blame low response on the decline of print media readership, the use of email spam filters or on the consumers’ short attention spans than it is to blame the strength (or weakness) of the message.

If the case for the product/service is so strong that it’s worth manufacturing and/or selling then maybe it wasn’t presented or described as effectively as it could have been. Maybe the message wasn’t integrated or leveraged effectively across the multiple channels. Many marketers overlook that a wide variety of different factors beyond the media mix affect the response rate and that the method of message delivery is but one of these factors, despite the disproportionate amount of attention it’s often given. Consider these other factors:

  • Does the product/service meet a need?
  • Does the message clearly solve that need?
  • Does the visual design capture attention and support delivery of the sales message?
  • Does the copywriting hold attention and lead to a response?
  • Is the message being delivered to the right audience?

Imagine a financial planner obsessing about the ideal asset allocation ratio among stocks, bonds and cash. It isn’t enough to conclude that 50 percent of assets need to be in stocks. To be successful, the planner needs to know in which stocks. For marketers, it isn’t enough to conclude that the budget needs to be allocated among different channels by a given ratio. There’s more to it than that. Marketing success demands the right message is delivered to the right audience with the right presentation at the right time. And that’s true whether the message is delivered by advertising, direct mail, publicity or any other channel.

How to determine the ideal media mix to follow in a separate post.

Oh, the Impact of Bad Press (Releases)

Friday, December 3rd, 2010

When I’m invited to speak about public relations, publicity and press releases, the marketing professionals and engineers in the audience usually want to know how to use PR to generate leads and get the word out without heavy investments in paid advertising. They want to use PR for good. But few consider the dark side: the use of PR with good intent but bad execution.

It’s often hard to see the results of badly executed publicity. Could more people have attended your trade show talk? Could the TV crews have descended on your booth instead of salivating at the old technology across the aisle? Could your new product have earned the front cover of a key industry magazine instead of being bumped in favor of your competitor’s technology? There’s simply no way to know how much buzz about your company or product wasn’t created or how many leads weren’t generated by allowing your product or company to be hindered by badly executed PR. Conversely, it’s easy to see the results of effective publicity in terms of media placements, retweets, search engine domination and lead generation, buzz in the industry, and even in attracting and recruiting skilled reps and staff.

It’s always a thrill to see your news release placement on the first page of the search results, knowing you’re driving prospects to your Web site at the expense of your competitors. But what if that news release doesn’t say exactly what you really wanted it to say? What if the facts or prices are wrong? What if instead of showcasing the benefits of your product or service it inadvertently brings attention to one of its few shortcomings – and the competition seizes on it, even touts the news release as an admission of the shortcoming from your own company? What was greeted at first as a PR victory becomes an embarrassment that will never…go…away.

It seems simple enough to be sure your own news releases present your products and services in the best possible light. But if it is so simple, then why is there so much badly executed PR out there?

Here’s How I’ve Seen It Happen

1.       OMG, we have a trade show tomorrow! An email from the show organizer arrives with a (second) reminder to provide a press release for the show Web site and for the at-show press room. So many bases were covered before the trade show that this one was overlooked. A copy and paste of a press release from last year’s trade show is hastily cobbled together and sent just in time to be included in the show organizer’s email to all registered media. Unfortunately, nobody checked to be sure the updated, upgraded product specs were included and it was published touting old, outdated technology.

2.       Our vendor (or customer) wants to do a joint PR story. They email the press release with an invitation to check the facts. They want to release it Monday morning. While the story isn’t unacceptable, it could offer a more compelling idea and you’re company is second fiddle. But who has time for a rewrite? At least your company location and date of founding are corrected. The press release flies out the door on Monday for the sake of expediency. But no one understands your product or service better than you and your team do. Leaving its presentation in the hands of a partner company with competing goals often carries greater risk and cost than perceived along with missing out on an opportunity to fully tell your story.

3.       My daughter (or son) is a business major and needs writing experience to get a good job next year. Having had the very rewarding experience of teaching college level journalism students how to devise a compelling news release, how to write it and how to present it to the media, I’ll simply state that students typically aren’t ready to develop materials that journalists want to publish. On the occasions I’ve seen this situation happen, the effect on the company’s exposure or sales hasn’t been positive. However, it has rankled employees in the marketing department and in other departments where staffers expect their work to be given the professional quality marketing expertise and attention it needs to succeed. After the engineering team toils for years on a new product, for example, it’s reasonable for them to expect marketing to give its launch serious attention.

4.       My boss wrote this – you can’t make any changes. You cringe at the thought of talking to a journalist knowing he or she is looking at the press release you’ve just sent – with your name at the top. How did your job go from establishing a corporate identity, inspiring the sales team and boosting sales to shilling for the boss’s pet project? The press release lacks a newsworthy story angle, is loaded with fake quotes that read in a way that people would never speak and it is filled with industry jargon and outdated buzzwords like “mission critical”. But nobody wants to say anything or rock the boat. It goes out the door as is and runs the next day on the Web sites of the two key trade magazines in which the company runs full page ad programs. Boss thinks it’s a success yet fails to see how this project affected the company’s credibility with the media (and his/her staff’s credibility), nor did the boss grasp the impact internally. It also missed an opportunity to score more effective, more widespread publicity. Another PR person might have devised a more effective way to promote the project and privately presented the boss with the alternative before releasing the second quality news.

With so much time, effort and investment involved in developing products and services, it seems senseless to allow your good news about them to be badly written and presented. Not every product or service is going to be a winner but if the commitment to how it is presented to the news media is lacking then even your winner product or service may become a loser or fail to deliver the anticipated ROI. No matter how bad PR gets generated, whether it happens in your company or is replaced by effective PR is a choice.

Your PR Program As Content Generator

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

Think of your PR program beyond publicity – beyond the media. Think of it as a content development program. It’s a planned, coordinated attack that consistently develops the information your prospects need to feel comfortable buying your products and/or services. Done properly, it’s presented in a style, structure and format that entice journalists to publish the information in their magazines, email newsletters, on their Web sites, blogs, and in other media. As effective PR, it generates qualified sales leads, boosts credibility and expands name brand awareness, but there’s so much more your informative news can be doing today:

epr Public Relations Content DevelopmentContent for your Web site – relax knowing your Web site will always feature fresh, new information. This instills confidence in prospects and customers and ensures coverage in search engines with both the content needed to appear in relevant searches and the frequent site updates needed to support high rankings. Google considers the freshness of content as an important factor determining search results.

Content for your email newsletters – it’s easy to stay in touch with customers and prospects and stick to your email newsletter schedule when you already have current news in the can that may be rewritten to suit an email publication. Plus, the email brings prospects back to the original article on the Web site.

Content for your social media program – now that your Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn pages are setup, it’s easy to keep them fresh by leveraging your news to suit the format of each platform. Your PR program provides a steady flow of postable material that can be rewritten to encourage comments and discussions and attract fan support.

Content for your blog – use your blog to reveal the backstory behind the news or add a personal angle to the story. Surely, developing a new product over several years required overcoming a host of challenges and surprises and sparked several inside jokes among the project team. This is the material that draws comments and interaction.

Once you get access to a constant flow of newsworthy concepts that warrant media attention, you’ll soon see there’s no reason to restrict their release to the media – there is every reason to leverage and reuse these concepts everywhere. The key is to uncover the worthy concepts hiding inside your product, service or company.

How to boost Google rankings

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

First in a Series:
I’m often asked about how to get higher rankings in Google. Some people insist on spending large sums of money with search positioning companies that guarantee top placement fast only to get mixed results. I pay attention to SEO trends but I do not claim to be an SEO specialist. I have developed and fine-tuned a program over the years, however, that has been proven to increase Google rankings. It works because it’s not based on tricking, cheating or staying one step ahead of Google. Instead it’s based on taking full advantage of how Google was designed to work.

Google’s rankings – even with the rise of social media – are based primarily on:

1. The number of links from other Web sites to your Web site
2. The relevance of those links to the search request

Therefore, if you want to increase your rankings in Google, you need to increase the number of links from other Web sites to your site, especially among Web sites that relate to your industry and you need to do this without trying to defraud Google.

One sure way to get links from relevant Web sites while ensuring you won’t be penalized is by placing relevant news releases and articles in print publications. That’s right… in print publications. Nearly all trade magazines archive the feature articles and news releases published in their print editions on their Web sites. And in nearly every case, they also include a link to your Web site. By placing a single, worthwhile news release in five or six magazines, we might secure five or six links. Do this once per month for a year and we might secure 72 or more links!

See example