Archive for the ‘PR’ Category

Lowe’s Boycott a Lesson in Media Planning

Monday, December 19th, 2011

This controversy would've been quite predictable for an experienced media planner. Did Lowe's failure at media planning cause this fracas?

Media planning – not crisis communications? Sure, some PR person will soon write up a case study declaring what the Lowe’s PR team did wrong amid the uproar over the company’s decision to pull its advertising from the TV show All-American Muslim. To summarize, Muslim groups have organized a boycott of Lowe’s as punishment for responding to the demand from a Christian group that the company pull its advertising from the show. I drove by a Lowe’s in Pennsylvania yesterday, btw, and saw no protesters (and few customers).

Yet the fatal failure in this fiasco falls not upon the crisis PR response but upon the media planning. If the case for advertising on the show was sound and advanced the interests of the shareholders then at least have the courage to stand by the decision when asked to pull the advertising. Instead, it appears Lowe’s caved pretty quickly, likely for fear of a boycott.

If it wasn’t a sound decision then the media planning failed and invited the costly controversy. Oh, what little care and consideration seems to be spent in deciding where to advertise!  It’s unfortunate that in many ad agencies and in-house marketing departments, media recommendations are entrusted to novices who lack the wisdom and experience to understand the ramifications of where their advertising dollars are placed. In fact, it’s scary to think how many people at Lowe’s with marketing and advertising job titles either never anticipated this situation, or worse, decided not to speak up for fear of appearing less than politically correct.

There is more to smart media planning than just numerical ratings, circulation and impressions. The mere act of supporting a show or publication suggests support for the content regardless of the organization’s actual positions, if any. Media planners bear a great responsibility to everyone in an organization that goes beyond delivering the ad message to the right people at the right time at the right place at the lowest cost. If this boycott grows legs and actually hurts Lowe’s then stores may be closed and good people put out of work. That’s the extended impact of media planning that needs to be carefully considered before media plans are approved and ad space is placed.

For anyone experienced in media planning, the backlash should’ve been completely predictable.

 

 

 

Word Up! Get Command Of English To Boost Your News Coverage

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

One of the more uncomfortable questions I’m often asked is, “What do you think of this press release?” Sometimes the most valuable selling point is buried towards the end. In other cases there’s so much fluffy nonsense it’s hard to figure out why the press release was even written. But in nearly every case, they read as if very little importance had been placed on the words selected. You’d think words might be vitally important for a press release yet words seem

Just because you put 250 words on letterhead and call it a press release doesn’t mean it’s going to help your business. If you want your news to get published then you need to pay attention to what the editors pay attention to when reviewing written materials.

to earn as little attention as grammar, usage and punctuation. “Who cares about commas and sentence structure? Who cares about replacing ‘is’ with an action verb, you ask?” Well, consider these actual bios of just a few of the trade magazine editors who get to read these press releases – they also decide whether to use them or hit delete (the names and their magazines have been removed):

  • …editor-in-chief…earned a Masters in Journalism from Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and a B.A. in English Literature from Harvard College.
  • … joined as editor from the University of Akron, where she had taught English composition for three years after earning a bachelor’s degree in philosophy. She also has a 1985 master of fine arts degree from Washington University in St. Louis.
  • editor graduated from Ohio’s Bowling Green State University with an English degree
  • … joins as editor after two-and-a-half years as a News Editor and has also been a high school English teacher and graduated from Northern Illinois University with a B.A. in English.

Editors care about words and notice when other writers do not care as much. Even one of the more respected chemical industry magazines has only a single chemical engineering degree on its entire editorial staff. The others studied English and journalism. Now see this introduction in an editorial by Anna Wells, Executive Editor, IMPO:

“As someone who spent the better part of college studying modern literary theory — a vocation so rich with complexity yet sparse in practical application — I can sympathize with the other liberal arts devotees out there: the ones with the music performance or art history degrees. Perhaps when I have a child in college and I am footing the bill, my understanding will lessen… but I hope not. For the sake of erudition (and the ability to use words like erudition in a sentence), I don’t regret the essays on Death in Venice, or the day I read The Sound & The Fury in UW-Madison’s Memorial Library stacks.”

Now, you can better see how a background in English affects how press releases are read. You can better see why it’s important to know when to use ensure or insure, and to know how to use the active voice and the passive voice (and which one to avoid in a press release). Just because you put 250 words on letterhead and call it a press release doesn’t mean it’s going to help your business. If you want your news to get published then you need to pay attention to what the editors pay attention to when reviewing written materials. I’d put words at the top of the list.

Enter Awards And Boost Your PR Coverage

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

The editors who decide whether to publish your news are sometimes too busy wading through the badly written, irrelevant or otherwise uninteresting news to give your well-written, well-presented, timely news the attention it needs to get published – especially if your company doesn’t have a widely recognized name brand. And now this wave of sub-par news material is also flooding their Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn accounts. If you want to be sure your product or service gets the editorial attention you know it deserves, submit it for an award.

Best Recycling Container Meese Orbitron Dunne Co.

Winning awards such as this Best Recycling Container award yields a credible logo that may be used in your marketing materials forever.

While some busy editors may delete your press release even before reading it, they’re quite careful to review entries to their awards programs. In many cases, these editors have personally conceptualized and developed their awards programs, they have sold the idea to their publishers and have an interest in the program’s success. They’re actively seeking products worthy of an award and will devote time to reading about your product when presented in this format.

Some awards programs charge a fee to enter, others are free. If your product wins then you’ll enjoy a wave of publicity that generates qualified leads and boosts credibility while providing an award logo for use on your Web site, in your brochures, advertising and in other materials – forever. The nomination alone provides material for your social media program. And the photo of you taken with the award at the black tie gala will be the talk of Facebook. But settle down. It’s more than likely that your product won’t actually win the award, which is fine, because the goal is simply to capture the editor’s attention, which you will. And if the award entry is well written and well presented then your next press release will likely get the attention it rightfully deserves. Then you’ll not only get the publicity you need but you’ll enjoy having an editor actively seeking your material month after month.

Here are several awards that might be worth entering for your company:

Plastics News Process of the Year

Processing’s Breakthrough Products of the Year

R&D 100 Awards

Chemical Processing Vaaler Awards

Medical Design Excellence Awards

Bizbash Event Style Awards

ISRI Design for Recycling Awards

IADD Awards

Call epr for entry preparation guidance at 908-479-4231.

So Much Focus on the Medium, Don’t Forget the Message

Monday, June 27th, 2011

Many marketing professionals obsess about finding the ideal mix of advertising, direct mail, publicity, social media, email, TV and other media – the “media mix” per advertising textbooks. Certainly, it’s effective to use several different channels but many of these marketers seem so focused on the medium and the ratio that they forget about the message – they forget the reason for all of their pondering, theorizing and calculating is to deliver a sales message.

When faced with lackluster response they conclude, “advertising doesn’t work,” or “direct mail doesn’t work, we tried that.” “Next time, we’ll focus a higher percentage on publicity,” for example. It’s easier to blame low response on the decline of print media readership, the use of email spam filters or on the consumers’ short attention spans than it is to blame the strength (or weakness) of the message.

If the case for the product/service is so strong that it’s worth manufacturing and/or selling then maybe it wasn’t presented or described as effectively as it could have been. Maybe the message wasn’t integrated or leveraged effectively across the multiple channels. Many marketers overlook that a wide variety of different factors beyond the media mix affect the response rate and that the method of message delivery is but one of these factors, despite the disproportionate amount of attention it’s often given. Consider these other factors:

  • Does the product/service meet a need?
  • Does the message clearly solve that need?
  • Does the visual design capture attention and support delivery of the sales message?
  • Does the copywriting hold attention and lead to a response?
  • Is the message being delivered to the right audience?

Imagine a financial planner obsessing about the ideal asset allocation ratio among stocks, bonds and cash. It isn’t enough to conclude that 50 percent of assets need to be in stocks. To be successful, the planner needs to know in which stocks. For marketers, it isn’t enough to conclude that the budget needs to be allocated among different channels by a given ratio. There’s more to it than that. Marketing success demands the right message is delivered to the right audience with the right presentation at the right time. And that’s true whether the message is delivered by advertising, direct mail, publicity or any other channel.

How to determine the ideal media mix to follow in a separate post.

Oh, the Impact of Bad Press (Releases)

Friday, December 3rd, 2010

When I’m invited to speak about public relations, publicity and press releases, the marketing professionals and engineers in the audience usually want to know how to use PR to generate leads and get the word out without heavy investments in paid advertising. They want to use PR for good. But few consider the dark side: the use of PR with good intent but bad execution.

It’s often hard to see the results of badly executed publicity. Could more people have attended your trade show talk? Could the TV crews have descended on your booth instead of salivating at the old technology across the aisle? Could your new product have earned the front cover of a key industry magazine instead of being bumped in favor of your competitor’s technology? There’s simply no way to know how much buzz about your company or product wasn’t created or how many leads weren’t generated by allowing your product or company to be hindered by badly executed PR. Conversely, it’s easy to see the results of effective publicity in terms of media placements, retweets, search engine domination and lead generation, buzz in the industry, and even in attracting and recruiting skilled reps and staff.

It’s always a thrill to see your news release placement on the first page of the search results, knowing you’re driving prospects to your Web site at the expense of your competitors. But what if that news release doesn’t say exactly what you really wanted it to say? What if the facts or prices are wrong? What if instead of showcasing the benefits of your product or service it inadvertently brings attention to one of its few shortcomings – and the competition seizes on it, even touts the news release as an admission of the shortcoming from your own company? What was greeted at first as a PR victory becomes an embarrassment that will never…go…away.

It seems simple enough to be sure your own news releases present your products and services in the best possible light. But if it is so simple, then why is there so much badly executed PR out there?

Here’s How I’ve Seen It Happen

1.       OMG, we have a trade show tomorrow! An email from the show organizer arrives with a (second) reminder to provide a press release for the show Web site and for the at-show press room. So many bases were covered before the trade show that this one was overlooked. A copy and paste of a press release from last year’s trade show is hastily cobbled together and sent just in time to be included in the show organizer’s email to all registered media. Unfortunately, nobody checked to be sure the updated, upgraded product specs were included and it was published touting old, outdated technology.

2.       Our vendor (or customer) wants to do a joint PR story. They email the press release with an invitation to check the facts. They want to release it Monday morning. While the story isn’t unacceptable, it could offer a more compelling idea and you’re company is second fiddle. But who has time for a rewrite? At least your company location and date of founding are corrected. The press release flies out the door on Monday for the sake of expediency. But no one understands your product or service better than you and your team do. Leaving its presentation in the hands of a partner company with competing goals often carries greater risk and cost than perceived along with missing out on an opportunity to fully tell your story.

3.       My daughter (or son) is a business major and needs writing experience to get a good job next year. Having had the very rewarding experience of teaching college level journalism students how to devise a compelling news release, how to write it and how to present it to the media, I’ll simply state that students typically aren’t ready to develop materials that journalists want to publish. On the occasions I’ve seen this situation happen, the effect on the company’s exposure or sales hasn’t been positive. However, it has rankled employees in the marketing department and in other departments where staffers expect their work to be given the professional quality marketing expertise and attention it needs to succeed. After the engineering team toils for years on a new product, for example, it’s reasonable for them to expect marketing to give its launch serious attention.

4.       My boss wrote this – you can’t make any changes. You cringe at the thought of talking to a journalist knowing he or she is looking at the press release you’ve just sent – with your name at the top. How did your job go from establishing a corporate identity, inspiring the sales team and boosting sales to shilling for the boss’s pet project? The press release lacks a newsworthy story angle, is loaded with fake quotes that read in a way that people would never speak and it is filled with industry jargon and outdated buzzwords like “mission critical”. But nobody wants to say anything or rock the boat. It goes out the door as is and runs the next day on the Web sites of the two key trade magazines in which the company runs full page ad programs. Boss thinks it’s a success yet fails to see how this project affected the company’s credibility with the media (and his/her staff’s credibility), nor did the boss grasp the impact internally. It also missed an opportunity to score more effective, more widespread publicity. Another PR person might have devised a more effective way to promote the project and privately presented the boss with the alternative before releasing the second quality news.

With so much time, effort and investment involved in developing products and services, it seems senseless to allow your good news about them to be badly written and presented. Not every product or service is going to be a winner but if the commitment to how it is presented to the news media is lacking then even your winner product or service may become a loser or fail to deliver the anticipated ROI. No matter how bad PR gets generated, whether it happens in your company or is replaced by effective PR is a choice.